|
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
DISCUSSIONS
|
March 28, 2006 Great fakers scammed ancient ItalyAn old lead coin looks like it was plated with silver.by Philip Ball
An ingenious counterfeit-coin scam has been rumbled by scientists in Italy. But no one is going to jail, because the forgers lived more than 2,000 years ago. Giuseppe Giovannelli of the University of Rome 'La Sapienza' and his colleagues took a close look at what seemed to be a silver coin minted in southern Italy in the third century BC. It turned out to be a lump of lead with a thin silver coating. This is not the first example of counterfeiting in the ancient world, but the researchers say that in this case the silver coating seems to have been created by a sophisticated chemical process. "We are not yet aware of any other counterfeit coins like this one," says Giovannelli. Tainted trove
Giovannelli and colleagues think that the coin was minted with deception in mind. The Italian researchers have used modern techniques to study the structure and composition of the metals, and have tried to work out how the fakery was done. A couple of simple counterfeiting methods have been spotted before. Old forgers could cover a metal lump with thin silver foil and heat it to fuse the foil on to the surface. They could also fake the look of a coin by chemically treating the surface of an alloy (which may or may not have contained precious metals) to give it a silvery or golden sheen. But the microscopic structure of the silver layer in this case differs from that produced by either of these methods. Instead it looks like something generated by a much more modern electroplating process, say researchers. Metallurgists of the time are not thought to have known about this technique. Copy of a copyTo solve the mystery, the Italian researchers devised a treatment that produces an effect similar to electroplating, using only materials known to be available in the third century BC. They immersed a lead object first in copper acetate (a compound made by letting vinegar corrode copper), and then in a silver solution created by dissolving silver chloride in dilute ammonia (which ancient chemists made from urine). This gave a film with "a cauliflower-like microtexture, with close similarities to that of the residual metal coating of the coin", says Giovannelli. Would the fakery have fooled merchants of the time? Metalsmiths knew how to detect forgeries of precious metals by measuring their density, using Archimedes' method of submersion in water to measure volume. But few would have gone to such extremes for coins handed over in a busy market, says Giovannelli. Visit our newsblog to read and post comments about this story.
Article Copyright © 2006 MacMillan Publishers Ltd. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. |
||||
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
BioEd Online is funded by grants from Houston Endowment Inc.; Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Science Education Partnership Award program of the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, NIH; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH; National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH; National Space Biomedical Research Institute; National Science Foundation (Divisions of Graduate Education and Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings); Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; RGK Foundation; The Powell Foundation; and the Houston Independent School District. © 2004—2010 Baylor College of Medicine. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use and Privacy Policy fruit fly image © 2001 Dennis Kunkel Microscopy, Inc. | ||